![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It came up in another another thread, but anybody else up for a group reading of the Hornblower books? God knows I could use the help in untangling Horatio "Contact with Reality is for the WEAK" Hornblower.
Since we'd be at least familiar with each other, personally, I'm thinking a very informal kind of thing -- the point is to know more about the books, after all, and not to read them all or something. So no mods, no leaders, not much of a schedule besides the knowledge that, say, next Tuesday, we'll start chattering about ________. If you're done reading, jump in. If you're not done reading, then you can choose between jumping in or staying out until you're done. Chatter contines until people are like "
quigonejinn, STFU and move on." And we do!
Totally flexible, though. Just point me in the direction of an excuse to re-read canon, and I'll be all over it. :D
ETA:
navalchronicle is up with an organizational post and a members-only one, too.
1. Should we do this on a mailing list or on LJ?
2. Approximately how fast do we want to go through the books? A book a month? More? Less? How fast do you want to read?
3. Do we want to go through the canon a book at a time, or should we go through them in chapters or bunches of chapters? (ex: we'll talk about chapters 12-19 of FC this week?)
4. Should we follow any kind of order? (IE, Forester publication or chronological? Or should we just go for the books that we damn well feel like?)
Since we'd be at least familiar with each other, personally, I'm thinking a very informal kind of thing -- the point is to know more about the books, after all, and not to read them all or something. So no mods, no leaders, not much of a schedule besides the knowledge that, say, next Tuesday, we'll start chattering about ________. If you're done reading, jump in. If you're not done reading, then you can choose between jumping in or staying out until you're done. Chatter contines until people are like "
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Totally flexible, though. Just point me in the direction of an excuse to re-read canon, and I'll be all over it. :D
ETA:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
1. Should we do this on a mailing list or on LJ?
2. Approximately how fast do we want to go through the books? A book a month? More? Less? How fast do you want to read?
3. Do we want to go through the canon a book at a time, or should we go through them in chapters or bunches of chapters? (ex: we'll talk about chapters 12-19 of FC this week?)
4. Should we follow any kind of order? (IE, Forester publication or chronological? Or should we just go for the books that we damn well feel like?)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-02 11:03 pm (UTC)1. Perhaps we keep it on LJ and start up a community specifically for it.
2. Speed -- we can start out with your idea of a book a month and then see where that gets us. I've done these where we go through a book every two weeks, or two months... depending.
3. Chapters. That way everyone's on nearly the same "page."
4. I'm thinking chronological. See the development of Scary!Crazy!Horatio as we go along that way.
Just my .02.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-02 11:08 pm (UTC)2. A book a month sounds like a good starting point. Since we've probably all read these at least once already, as it goes along we may be find that we can speed up the timetable.
3. I have no real preference for chunking the discussion a whole book at a time vs. doing it piecemeal. How's that for decisive. *g*
4. I'm torn between chronological and the 'whichever way the wind is blowing'. But for the semblance of some sort of order I'll stop waffling and say chronological.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 12:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-02 11:11 pm (UTC)my vote is for chuncks of chapters other than whole books, just so i can keep things fresh in my head.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-02 11:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 12:03 am (UTC)either mailing list or lj, you choose. i am partial to mailing list, but lj is just fine.
book a month to start sounds great. but really, we should just go along at our own pace, as dictated by how quickly we work through our -->
chunks of chapters, i think, except for the first book -- 1 chapter at a time there, i think. also the last book -- 1 story at a time.
i say in chronological order. but i will go with whatever anyone else wants. same for all of it.
it is 4am and i have class in <5 hours and i cannot sleep.
Date: 2006-02-03 09:04 am (UTC)We're talking publication order, right? Beat to Quarters with its inimiatble Crazy!Horatio and then Crisis, at the end, with the extra storie at the end that they threw on for padding?
Group conensus makes it look like we're probably going to do it in chron order, unfortunately. Are you minded to do Midshipman one story-chapter at a time?
Re: it is 4am and i have class in <5 hours and i cannot sleep.
Date: 2006-02-04 01:57 am (UTC)Crazy baby boyfriend lovers of the world unite
Date: 2006-02-03 12:57 am (UTC)2. A book a month seems good for people who are reading for the first time, though not as fast as I want to consume them.
3. I don't care.
4. I think we should go in the order Forester wrote them, because that's what I did first and it makes sense to me. Plus I find Atropos even more heartbreaking if you already know what happens to those kids.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 12:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 09:09 am (UTC)Alas. I think we're going to end up doing them in chron order. :/
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 03:39 pm (UTC)And I'm back to waffling over the chronoogical vs. publication order. There's advantage and disadvantage to both for new readers.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-04 05:38 am (UTC)I was talking to a friend tonight who is about to embark on reading the books (my powers of pimping are mighty), and I talked myself into the opposite opinion than I had before, just because she is very spoiler-averse wrt movies and tv, and knowing how the story comes out really ruins it for her. She's kind of on one end of the spectrum there, but I think there's a little of that in many people. I don't personally have that issue, but also, people do seem to do better with linear storytelling, in my experience in fandom.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 01:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 02:08 am (UTC)*shrugs* Just a suggestion, of course. If you need help, I'd be glad to help.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 02:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 06:10 am (UTC)I think the idea of a LJ community would be the best way to go.
Perhaps a chapter a week would be a good pace, as most people on LJ do have real lives. ;)
No real preference as to the order, though I think it would be neat to do them in order and be able to discuss this with others. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 09:07 am (UTC)Chapter a week would really do a lot to provoke in-depth discussion and dense analysi, but I think mots of us are inclined to push a little faster. Plus, there are some total filler chapters, esp. in the ones that were really written to be serialized, so yeah.
Would you be OK with doing four to five chapters a week?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-03 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-04 05:22 pm (UTC)1. lj
2. One book a month
3. Chapters because it gives us a smaller chunk of book to work with and would probably lead to more in-depth discussion.
4. chronological
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-04 06:41 pm (UTC)And
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-06 12:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-07 02:53 pm (UTC)And yeah, fandom depressed the hell out of me in the beginning because even though I love Archie and movieHornblower, I desperately wanted fic about Flying Colours and crankycaptain!Hornblower and, you know. The wonders and marvels of Bush. I'm amazed you made it through the hellaciously ginormous and wanktastic bit of analysis. XD
Anyway. There's a little wedge of us hanging out here with an abiding interest in the books. Come hang out with us.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-08 01:31 pm (UTC)